tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post8175694122527377275..comments2023-09-21T16:17:51.838+05:30Comments on Law and Other Things: How about 'partner'?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09348738084817273397noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post-75224343906441024492010-10-27T11:02:22.418+05:302010-10-27T11:02:22.418+05:30I think the whole discussion of "keep" (...I think the whole discussion of "keep" (para 34) as denigrating a woman is taken completely out of context. <br /><br />When a law is vague and need to be materialized to understand the limits, it is good that the extremes (even though not socially acceptable) are being talked about. And Justice Katju reference is with respect to setting the bounderies of the vague law. Nowhere he has said that the particular petitioner is a "keep" or something like that.<br /><br />Setting this stick of social politeness for everything including details in judgments is a bad idea.Sushant Sinhahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11122606453459362552noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post-40832561839947311562010-10-23T00:07:30.531+05:302010-10-23T00:07:30.531+05:30Wikipedia does have a way of self-correcting thoug...Wikipedia does have a way of self-correcting though doesn't it? . .. <br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markandey_KatjuNick Robinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07188754890135788657noreply@blogger.com