tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post5289896280112046625..comments2023-09-21T16:17:51.838+05:30Comments on Law and Other Things: NJAC hearing in Supreme Court: Merits of AG's plea for reference to a larger BenchAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09348738084817273397noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post-66030380002098303062015-05-12T19:55:18.742+05:302015-05-12T19:55:18.742+05:30The question is not whether 9 judges' Bench de...The question is not whether 9 judges' Bench decision is binding on a Bench of smaller size. Of course, it is. But my point is whether the 1993 decision binds the 5 Judge Bench to decide the NJAC matter in favour of petitioners. Obviously, the current Bench doesn't think so at this preliminary stage and believes that it can keep an open mind despite the 1993 judgment. I hope I made myself clear.V.Venkatesanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08138846925562952785noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post-27899180165676959412015-05-11T13:20:53.741+05:302015-05-11T13:20:53.741+05:30My response to this post explaining why the SC mus...My response to this post explaining why the SC must immediately refer the NJAC case to an 11 Judge Bench http://seemasapra.blogspot.in/2015/05/njac-case-before-supreme-court-of-india.htmlSeema Saprahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07094308832539462568noreply@blogger.com