tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post461763169338137297..comments2023-09-21T16:17:51.838+05:30Comments on Law and Other Things: Andhra Pradesh Civil Liberties Committee v. The Government of APAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09348738084817273397noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post-19327134265029712822009-03-15T17:28:00.000+05:302009-03-15T17:28:00.000+05:30yes, one hopes the SC would have asked these obvio...yes, one hopes the SC would have asked these obvious questions. but the news report does not say much, and I cant think of a reason why the court would have stayed this well-reasoned judgment.Tarunabh Khaitanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07234574402062317396noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post-33413252630782354152009-03-15T13:13:00.000+05:302009-03-15T13:13:00.000+05:30So what if a FIR, according to the AP High Court O...So what if a FIR, according to the AP High Court Order, should be registered say, against the police who killed the terrorists during the attack on the Parliament? I doubt if this argument was the basis for our Supreme Court to summarily stay this well reasoned judgment of the Court below. <BR/><BR/>Certainly, the Court might have asked: <BR/><BR/>'So what?' <BR/><BR/>'Wheres the immunity to the Police from not being subject to the same set of laws that govern the cognizance of a crime'? <BR/><BR/>'And on what authority is a death resulting from a Police operation or action presumed by Law to be done in due discharge of police power of the State?'<BR/><BR/>'And what strength is left of such presumption specifically when blind faith in this presumption has indeed cultivated utter lawlessness and wanton savagery in the police?'K.V.DHANANJAYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05545845529229026684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post-44316502384770210782009-03-13T00:30:00.000+05:302009-03-13T00:30:00.000+05:30i read the statesman article by venkatramana....he...i read the statesman article by venkatramana....he seems to be arguing for a blanket immunity to be given to the actions of police personnel, something which cannot be allowed. <BR/><BR/>as mr. venkatramana argues, the Constitution bestows upon individuals, fundamental rights. however, suggestive of the blanket immunity as his argument is; would stand to defeat the very purpose of the constitutional safeguards.Piggy Littlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13112159490654492447noreply@blogger.com