tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post4547367502318024711..comments2023-09-21T16:17:51.838+05:30Comments on Law and Other Things: Korean lawyers publish judges' report cardsAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09348738084817273397noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post-7205880464599287422009-02-21T09:00:00.000+05:302009-02-21T09:00:00.000+05:30In fact, Delhi did it before Korea could do it. T...In fact, Delhi did it before Korea could do it. The consequences, of course, left a big big question mark. I am talking about what a magazine "Wah India" did 6-7 years back.<BR/>Check out the link for more details:<BR/>http://www.thehoot.org/web/home/searchdetail.php?sid=31&bg=1Mahfuuzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02827773125942967751noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post-10730960279590056472009-02-20T16:52:00.000+05:302009-02-20T16:52:00.000+05:30while we are debating judicial performance, this d...while we are debating judicial performance, <A HREF="http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.aspx?id=NEWEN20090084067" REL="nofollow">this disturbing case</A> on recusal of a judge from a gujarat riots case needs attention. should a judge be allowed to do this without objecting from parties or without citing legitimate reasons (like being an interested party)? if the judge is under pressure, it is a serious matter concerning judicial independence. whatever is the matter, we need to know the reasons. in an apparently <A HREF="http://www.gallup.com/poll/110968/South-Africa-High-Level-Confidence-Judiciary.aspx" REL="nofollow">comparable incident in south africa</A>, the judge who was pressurised went public and complained to higher judiciary. surely, this is a better course of action than recusal.Tarunabh Khaitanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07234574402062317396noreply@blogger.com