tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post1008564147414217093..comments2023-09-21T16:17:51.838+05:30Comments on Law and Other Things: Should our political parties get big money in big sums? Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09348738084817273397noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post-10864069712584191372014-06-17T22:33:35.617+05:302014-06-17T22:33:35.617+05:30Interesting post. My new article High Courts and...Interesting post. My new article <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2431017" rel="nofollow"> High Courts and Election Law Reform in the United States and India </a> compares the different approaches of the U.S. and Indian Supreme Courts to the review of campaign finance and election law reforms. It then seeks to provide an explanatory account for the divergent approaches to electoral reform within each judiciary. Several key factors account for the divergent approaches of the two supreme courts: the distinct jurisprudence of each court in the area of fundamental rights, the composition of the courts, and the nature of corruption in each system. <br /><br />It concludes by analyzing both the normative and prescriptive implications of the different approaches to electoral reform in each country, proposing a new conception of the participatory model of speech as encompassing a broader set of approaches to advancing the goal of participation in election law reform, and suggesting that the different approaches in the U.S. and Indian Supreme Courts reflect the “liberal” and “positive rights” conceptions of the participatory model. Here is a <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2431017" rel="nofollow">link</a> to the article.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com