tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post4885517926487126382..comments2023-09-21T16:17:51.838+05:30Comments on Law and Other Things: Former Chief Justice Kabir's legacy and some recent instances of judicial activismAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09348738084817273397noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15602189.post-82228975806922549482013-07-23T00:41:48.168+05:302013-07-23T00:41:48.168+05:30In the 'Faculty association of AIIMS v. Union ...In the 'Faculty association of AIIMS v. Union of India' case, you have mentioned, 'It says in Paragraph 19 that the very concept of reservation implies mediocrity!'<br /><br />I read paragraph 19 and it says and I quote, 'We cannot take a different view, even though it has been suggested that such an observation was not binding, being obiter in nature. We cannot ascribe to such a view since the very concept of reservation implies mediocrity and we will have to take note of the caution indicated in Indra Sawhney's case.'<br /><br />Can you please explain what do they mean by 'we cannot ascribe to such a view.' What view are they referring to?Sanmayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03274628279459136205noreply@blogger.com